|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: n2 vs co2
In Reply to: n2 vs co2 posted by starwind on November 13, 2002 at 02:33:59:
|
|
Posted by: Razorpb on November 13, 2002 at 14:27:22
|
Best reason is consistency. Ever have a problem getting up to 280 fps in the winter, and not being able to keep it under 280 in the summer. If not you will when running unregulated C02. HPA stays more consistent and does not rely on ambient air temperature to control pressure. You fill more when using HPA but a scuba is about $4 to fill and you can go for 2-3 outings. It is more cost up front for the scuba, fill station, and tank. But less headaches and cost in the long run. A reg with C02 will definetely help until you play in really cold weather when the C02 won't put out enough pressure to cock your high pressure marker. Scuba about $100, fill station $50, tanks as cheap as $80 for steel 47 cu 3000psi. Hope it helps. Razor
: thanks!
|
|
Follow Ups:
|
| Copyright © 1992-2019
Corinthian Media Services. WARPIG's webmasters can be reached through our feedback form. All articles and images are copyrighted and may not be redistributed without the written permission of their original creators and Corinthian Media Services. The WARPIG paintball page is a collection of information and pointers to sources from around the internet and other locations. As such, Corinthian Media Services makes no claims to the trustworthiness or reliability of said information. The information contained in, and referenced by WARPIG, should not be used as a substitute for safety information from trained professionals in the paintball industry. |