|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Low Pressure Spyder: CO2 or HPA?
In Reply to: Low Pressure Spyder: CO2 or HPA? posted by Brandon68 on May 03, 2003 at 00:26:45:
|
|
Posted by: PigTech on May 12, 2003 at 13:03:06 Forum Administrator
|
: I'm thinking about converting my Spyder TL Plus to a low pressure system. What kind of experience have you all had with CO2 or HPA on this type of system? Whichever gas you can get easiest. One of the few undeniable advantages to low pressure operation is that CO2 can reliably used to power a low pressure paintgun. The CO2 must of course be regulated to the lower pressure, and as long as that pressure is below the lowest pressure the tank gets to when it chills, you will be fine. See you on the field,
|
|
Follow Ups:
|
| Copyright © 1992-2019
Corinthian Media Services. WARPIG's webmasters can be reached through our feedback form. All articles and images are copyrighted and may not be redistributed without the written permission of their original creators and Corinthian Media Services. The WARPIG paintball page is a collection of information and pointers to sources from around the internet and other locations. As such, Corinthian Media Services makes no claims to the trustworthiness or reliability of said information. The information contained in, and referenced by WARPIG, should not be used as a substitute for safety information from trained professionals in the paintball industry. |