Posted by: moosecustome on October 22, 2003 at 09:03:29

difference between Co2 and Nitrogen in terms of pros and cons? co2 nitrogen cheap tanks $20max expensive tanks $90-$600 readily available not easy to get tanks tanks fills mostly local fills may be a drive to get now the nitty gritty large velosity jumps very consistant could get liquid in never go liquid (freeze) marker not good for trigger excelent for trigger happys happy players fill adds weight fill dosent add weight heavier marker damage to tank cheap to replace expensive to replace that is what i can think of for now. hope this helps. your play style makes the biggest diffrence my choice is a 16oz Co2 chromoly tank with palmer stabilizer, but if you have money to burn get a 45/4500psi nitro tank or at least a 4500 or a 5000psi tank

Follow Ups: well that is a mess try this instead. moosecustome 09:12:04 10/22/03 (0) Post a Followup Show your name as: DefaultRealnameBothNickname E-Mail address (eg: joeschmoe@aol.com): Show your e-mail address? DefaultYesNo Your Password: Don't have a password? CLICK HERE - Forgot your password? CLICK HERE Subject: Subject:Message: : difference between Co2 and Nitrogen in terms of pros and cons? : co2 nitrogen : cheap tanks $20max expensive tanks $90-$600 : readily available not easy to get : tanks tanks : fills mostly local fills may be a drive to get : now the nitty gritty : large velosity jumps very consistant : could get liquid in never go liquid (freeze) : marker : not good for trigger excelent for trigger happys : happy players : fill adds weight fill dosent add weight : heavier marker : damage to tank : cheap to replace expensive to replace : : that is what i can think of for now. hope this helps. : your play style makes the biggest diffrence : my choice is a 16oz Co2 chromoly tank with palmer stabilizer, but if you have money to burn get a 45/4500psi nitro tank or at least a 4500 or a 5000psi tank [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ WARPIG Tech Talk - Air ]