: Which would you reccommend? I've seen the Turbo Rev board and it's "Wicked" quick, i've not seen the intelifeed working yet (Living a sheltered life in practically paintball free Italy). Take a look at the WARPIG Ballistic labs loader comparison in the Technical section. The Turbo Rev board is a drastic improvement over the 1999-2001 Revolution board, but not so far ahead of the newer X-Board equipped Revys. The Ricochet is up there too. The Ricochet will agitate with every ball fired, so pretty much performance wise, it's like the most active intellifeed mode (spin with each shot).
:With all the control you have over the intellifeed using an IR3, which do you think would be the better method?
: Thanks in advance for your input.
: -Doc
What I think will be the real head-turner is the second generation HALO (I've seen prototypes, and existing HALO owners will be able to upgrade) with an intellifeed connection (I don't know if that will be available when the 2nd gen ships, but sooner or later either Odyssey will do it, or some third party will design an effective hack for it).
As for the upper end loaders that are on the market now, I doubt you're going see that big of a difference from Intellifeed over the stock electronics. The big differences I expect to see are better feeding with the IR3s feed gate (ball bobble is a big issue when trying to use an optical sensor to detect a gap in the stack on a vertical feed system), and the IR3's adjustable intellifeed being really put to use with force fed systems like the 2nd Gen HALO or Warp Feed.
See you on the field,
-Bill Mills
Home