|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: should i get an angel or an autococker
In Reply to: should i get an angel or an autococker posted by mike martone on April 24, 2003 at 16:57:45:
|
|
Posted by: m98monkey on April 26, 2003 at 15:24:19
|
Well, the 2003 limiteds are becoming really hard to come by, but they are also way faster then most cockers, and generally less expensive. I like them personaly, they feel sweet. However I also own an orracle autococker and can't deny the benefits of a cocker. Speed isn't near as high, efficiency is about the same, but the cocker just is so accurate. One on top of the other type. The angel is accurate, but not like a cocker, least I think. Plus, I like to tinker with my gun, and a cocker is a tinkering mans gun. If you want less maitnenace, speed, and sweet looks, get the angel. If you like to play with the gun alot, want accuracy over speed, and sweet looks, build your own cocker. Atleast that is what I think you should do.
|
|
Follow Ups:
|
| Copyright © 1992-2019
Corinthian Media Services. WARPIG's webmasters can be reached through our feedback form. All articles and images are copyrighted and may not be redistributed without the written permission of their original creators and Corinthian Media Services. The WARPIG paintball page is a collection of information and pointers to sources from around the internet and other locations. As such, Corinthian Media Services makes no claims to the trustworthiness or reliability of said information. The information contained in, and referenced by WARPIG, should not be used as a substitute for safety information from trained professionals in the paintball industry. |