|
|
|
Posted by Razorpb on October 29, 2002 at 15:17:30:
In Reply to: Re: Autococker difference posted by
With the STO your mainly buying for the flashy looks, stock is much cheaper, and you can start your own scheme of milling if you want, rather than take theirs, if you notice it is the same body as the Black Magic, without the flames. Building your own cocker from parts will be more expensive, but you'll get exactly what you want. Razor : In my eyes the STO is more or less the same than a stock cocker. It only has the milling and STO front pneumatics. IŽd go for the stock and build it up to your likings unless you really like the looks of the STO......
: But then if I was to get a cocker IŽd build it up from scratch or get a freeflow anyway ;)
: : If I buy a Worrgames 2002 Vertical Feed Autococker will it shot just as straight and just as well as an STO and also is it worth it to buy it.
Subject:Message:
Copyright © 1992-2019
Corinthian Media Services. WARPIG's webmasters can be reached through our feedback form. All articles and images are copyrighted and may not be redistributed without the written permission of their original creators and Corinthian Media Services. The WARPIG paintball page is a collection of information and pointers to sources from around the internet and other locations. As such, Corinthian Media Services makes no claims to the trustworthiness or reliability of said information. The information contained in, and referenced by WARPIG, should not be used as a substitute for safety information from trained professionals in the paintball industry. |