Posted by: Razorpb on April 21, 2003 at 18:02:36

A remote line would do a better job than the anti-siphon tube. Razor : One thing you could consider is anti-siphon with a better co2 reg like the palmer stabilizer. They are great co2 regs, but it really would be a waste because the stock reg is about the same except without the chambering to handle co2, so when you got hpa, you wasted money on a good reg, but more designed for co2. It won't hurt the reg or anything, and it is a great regulator, but still was more designed for co2 and you won't use it to its best capacity.

Follow Ups: Post a Followup Show your name as: DefaultRealnameBothNickname E-Mail address (eg: joeschmoe@aol.com): Show your e-mail address? DefaultYesNo Your Password: Don't have a password? CLICK HERE - Forgot your password? CLICK HERE Subject: Subject:Message: : A remote line would do a better job than the anti-siphon tube. : Razor : : One thing you could consider is anti-siphon with a better co2 reg like the palmer stabilizer. They are great co2 regs, but it really would be a waste because the stock reg is about the same except without the chambering to handle co2, so when you got hpa, you wasted money on a good reg, but more designed for co2. It won't hurt the reg or anything, and it is a great regulator, but still was more designed for co2 and you won't use it to its best capacity. [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ WARPIG Tech Talk - Autococker / Minicocker ]