Posted by: Tom_J. "ap0c" Miller on February 07, 2003 at 19:17:12

well, actually one of the major reasons why I was considering the Blazer was not because it did not have many aftermarket upgrade parts, but because they aren't really necessary, it comes stock with 45 hinge trigger, rock regulator, and QuickSwitch 4-way. Also, I currently own a spyder that is in poor condition but has a practically brand new smart parts barrel- that would not fit a cocker. Due to the no-thread barrel system used by pps, I could have the threads milled off, and would be able to use my current sp barrel. Price is more than the stock cocker(by about $50), but I have found that the stock cocker's performance is not that great- which goes back to upgrades. Aesthetics are not that great and that is it's major weakness. Please post again, I am curious about your bad experience with palmers, as I am somewhat worried about the fact that there are very few people who know how to fix the blazer other than PPS(they are in cali, I am in NH). : I tell everyone I can to boycott Palmer, bad experience with them. A few things to consider: 1: how many upgrade parts are available for the blazer. 2: Can you put a nice smart parts or any other aftermarket barrel on them - no. 3: Price, last I checked there about twice the price of a stock cocker. 4: Aesthetics (how does it look). Just my opinions, hope it helps. : Razor : : : I am just wondering what your opinion on the PPS Blazer is, and which 'gun(cocker or blazer) is the "better" marker. : : -Tom "apoc" Miller

Follow Ups: Re: Biased opinion but.. Razorpb 15:36:26 02/10/03 (2) Re: Biased opinion but.. Tom_J. "ap0c" Miller 16:00:40 02/10/03 (1) base 2002 autococker Jasleth 19:53:35 03/13/03 (0) Post a Followup Show your name as: DefaultRealnameBothNickname E-Mail address (eg: joeschmoe@aol.com): Show your e-mail address? DefaultYesNo Your Password: Don't have a password? CLICK HERE - Forgot your password? CLICK HERE Subject: Subject:Message: : well, actually one of the major reasons why I was considering the Blazer was not because it did not have many aftermarket upgrade parts, but because they aren't really necessary, it comes stock with 45 hinge trigger, rock regulator, and QuickSwitch 4-way. : Also, I currently own a spyder that is in poor condition but has a practically brand new smart parts barrel- that would not fit a cocker. Due to the no-thread barrel system used by pps, I could have the threads milled off, and would be able to use my current sp barrel. : Price is more than the stock cocker(by about $50), but I have found that the stock cocker's performance is not that great- which goes back to upgrades. : Aesthetics are not that great and that is it's major weakness. : Please post again, I am curious about your bad experience with palmers, as I am somewhat worried about the fact that there are very few people who know how to fix the blazer other than PPS(they are in cali, I am in NH). : : I tell everyone I can to boycott Palmer, bad experience with them. A few things to consider: 1: how many upgrade parts are available for the blazer. 2: Can you put a nice smart parts or any other aftermarket barrel on them - no. 3: Price, last I checked there about twice the price of a stock cocker. 4: Aesthetics (how does it look). Just my opinions, hope it helps. : : Razor : : : : : I am just wondering what your opinion on the PPS Blazer is, and which 'gun(cocker or blazer) is the "better" marker. : : : -Tom "apoc" Miller [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ WARPIG Tech Talk - High End Paintguns ]