|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted by DougSeman on March 01, 2002 at 11:09:06:
In Reply to: Re: one more thing posted by
First comment was that I DID try to go to your website you listed. Which of course did not exist. Still not even close to enough info to tell you whether it was a decent experiment, and again, if it was and it showed what you stated, they have broken laws of physics. I tried to call you on basic laws of nature, but you seem to wish to deny them. I can't do much more on this subject, so I think I'll sign off and let you get back to what you wish to say. Doug Seman
: Agree? Now I'm am not sure where you got that from. We won't agree on anything until I actualy see you post in this forum that cockers are better than angels when it comes to distance and accuracy. You'll notice that I have dropped the rate of fire subject, but on do to the fact that rate of fire is dependent on ones trigger finger and that somepeople are more skilled when it comes to different triggger pulls that others may not be able to obtain equal rates of fire without a lightened trigger. And about the test, if you had only gone to the website I listed above after you so EAGERLY asked me to give it ot you, you would understand all the specifics of the test. Ok the paint was shot at a 2 foot by 2 foot piece of plywood that was mounted three feet from the ground. The center of the board was straight in line with barrel of each gun. after each shot at the board it was moved forward or back. If the ball broke near the center the board was moved 10 feet back to the next marker, if the splatt was in between the bottom of the board and the center the board was moved back 5 feet. If the ball fell before the board or did not splatt the board was moved 5 feet forward. Some minor adjustments were made for different dpatts but that was the basic setup for the experiment.
TIP #11