|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted by DougSeman on February 28, 2002 at 20:11:27:
In Reply to: Re: one more thing posted by
How did you go about testing this 'effective range', now that we've found out that you did not test actual physical range. You said you fired, and that those that did not fall counted. What does this mean? Firing at a target? Firing above or below a mark? What? Now accuracy can in part be determined by a paintball gun, so 'effective range', although VERY subjective (I'd like to know how it was tested here, I haven't heard a good one yet) can change. However, I believe we have now agreed that you have not come up with the miracle test that proves physics wrong. Doug Seman
: OK here it is we only tested effective range. And about the free space, we had plenty of it, 10 acres to be exact where the new feilds are going in. Measuring it was no problem either. It was set up so that every 10 feet was maked so we only had to measure in from there. I did not test for the drop so only the shots that did not fall counted. This could have caused a mistake I admit. You reach the proshop at www.teamsplattattack.org/pro/shop
TIP# 11
pb-allstar
22:58:01 02/28/02
(1)
DougSeman
11:09:06 03/01/02
(0)